Clare

My proposal for North at Summerhall

Proposal for North

I am in the middle of marking ‘Writing for Performance’ submissions from my students at Glasgow University. The first thing they are asked to write is a proposal. It is quite a difficult thing to do in many ways and it made me think that I should write one for my project North at Summerhall.

 The course tells students that a proposal is a clear and concise statement of

  1. A description of the project
  2. Your aims in undertaking the project
  3. Your proposed working methods
  4. The theoretical or critical frameworks relevant to your project and examples of practice, which relate to your project.

 

A brief description of the project

North will be a site-specific installation in the Small Animal Hospital (SAH) at Summerhall about the effects and affects of extreme light conditions in the North. I am taking ‘the north’ to be the world at and beyond the 60 degree parallel. It will combine a character-based story with an immersive experience of differently lit rooms. There will be no restrictions to the audience in how much time they can spend in the installation or how many times they can come back.

 

My Aims

I want to create a journey through different rooms of light to give an audience an embodied experience of how powerfully light affects our perception, senses and mood. I hope I can create the space for the audience to connect this experience with ideas and questions about light: what we know scientifically about light and how we understand it through language. These ideas I hope will lead the audience to make their own insights into how fundamentally light environments form who we are as a species, as individual people and communities.

 

I aim to connect the physical experience of the rooms of light with ideas about light through a story. This will be about a fictional character, an ex-keeper of a lighthouse in the Arctic Ocean, who is trying to understand light and his relationship to a ‘science-fictional’ character, an arctic warrior who has had the part of her brain that receives signals from light removed. This means that she does not need to sleep but experiences intense hallucinations for 2 hours every night. The idea for this is based on the very rare ‘Morvan’s Syndrome’.[1]

 

Some important practical questions I hope to answer at this stage of the development of this project are:

1)    How does an audience practically chose to experience a ‘journey through light’ when they are free to travel through it as they wish? How long do they want to stay in each room? Do I need to think about seating?

2)    Will audience members construct themselves in some way as co-creators of this story and/or world? If they do, how do they do that? Do they perhaps construct themselves as characters and/or as an ‘authorial eye’?

3)    How does it feel to be offered a blacked out room to move through? Should I offer torches or candles or both? How should those be offered?

4)    How can I make sure an audience is adequately supported in the journey so they are free to explore it without either being in any danger or feeling too much fear or uncertainty?

5)    I think I want to make one room that is ‘horrific’ or scary. Is it possible to feel fear in a ‘good’ way in this context?

6)    How might rooms of coloured light connect with a story about light environments? Could this be part of a creation of the hallucinations of the Arctic Warrior?

7)    How will the piece be experienced by someone who is blind?

8)    Should the installation contain live performance? If there is live performance should that be of the fictional characters and/or of ‘an attendant’ or ‘author’ character who can engage with the audience about the work itself.

 

Your proposed working methods

Development of text: I have spent two weeks in Shetland in June and December, the two most extreme light environment times of that place. In the first week I met with potential partners and collaborators: David Hazzlrigg, now Professor of Arctic and Marine biology at the Arctic University of Norway and then at Aberdeen University, the Shetland Arts team and the Lerwick based writer Jacqui Clarke. I also researched some of the history of Shetland and visited the most northerly place in the UK in Unst, from where I saw the Muckle Flucker lighthouse. I went to the museum in Unst and read some of the history of the Muckle Flucker and this led me to think about creating a story about a fictional lighthouse further north in the Arctic Ocean.

 

I returned in December and wrote the diary of the lighthouse keeper. I wrote this long hand into a diary as if I were that lighthouse keeper. This is a development of a practice I created as part of my doctorate in playwriting. In that research I wrote a series of plays by writing on and about a public bench for extended periods of time. I wrote for 24 hours of the day and night and then dramatized that text on a stage within 5 minutes walk of the bench.

 

In December I aimed to write again on a pubic bench for 24 hours in the same way. But I found it much harder than in the past. I do not know definitely why that was. Perhaps it was because I was writing for the SAH in Edinburgh and that distance between the place and the performance directed my writing towards fictionalizing this experience of long dark days in Lerwick. Also, perhaps I did not want to write for so long outside because it was so much odder to sit on a bench writing in a place with such a small population. There couldn’t have been more than 20 people living on the peninsular where I was staying. I felt much more exposed as a stranger behaving in a strange way, than I did on benches in cities. There were often moments when I was scared when writing in this way in cities, but I knew how to quickly become an anonymous part of the usual flow of people in a city. In the rural environment of the peninsular I realized that I would need to stay much longer and invest much more deeply in my personal relations with the people who lived there to feel comfortable sitting for very long periods of time in one place.[2]

 

During this time in December 2013 I read the books that Prof. Hazzelrigg recommended to me: The Rhythms of Life: The biological Clocks That Control the Daily Lives of Every Living Thing, byRussell Foster and Leon Kreitzman and Trawler, by Redmond O’Hanlon as well as his own publications on endocrinology. The other books that are feeding this process are Pale Fire by Vladimir Nabokov, Light by Scott Palmer and The Idea of North by Peter Davidson. I am also reading about the science of light.

 

Creating the journey through light in the SAH: I will be working with Katharine Williams. She will work with me for 3 days in the first week, when we will start to create a journey through different light environments. We have begun to talk about how we will do that and this proposal will also be part of how I communicate the project with her.

 

I will then record the lighthouse keeper’s text in the space. Katherine will come back for 2 days in the second week and I hope my mentor Stewart Laing will come and see the work so far in that second week of development. I will then plan the final two weeks of development. Finally, there will be an open work-in-progress for an invited and public audience on the 6th June 2014. I will then take part in a critical feedback process that will be organized by Summerhall probably on the 6th June. The outcomes from that feedback will form the basis of how I take the work on over the next two years with the Creative Scotland artist bursary.

 

Critical and Practice Context

This project builds directly on my practice-as-research doctorate, where I began to think critically about how societies use the cycles of light over days and seasons to construct what is ‘normal’.[3] So, I have ‘arrived’ in the North from a queer time and place and the work of queer theorists Sara Ahmed, Jon Binnie, Judith Butler, Michael Foucault and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick.

My PhD was about playwriting for mainstream theatre venues and North is taking a turn towards the visual arts. Traditionally theatre imposes time constraints on the audience: There is a time when the show starts and finishes. I am interested in how removing these time constraints might affect how I write ‘a play’.

Janet Cardiff and George Bures Miller’s work is an important practical context for this aspect of the project. I am particularly inspired by Opera For A Small Room, which I saw at the Fruitmarket, Edinburgh in 2008.[4] It really impressed me how close this work came to being dramatic, even though there were no performers. I felt that I was almost a performer in the piece and that I was seeing the other people looking at the piece as either characters or actors in a drama. I felt Cardiff and Miller, in this and other installations in that exhibition, offer their audience stories through ‘found objects’ they have arranged in the rooms or spaces they have made. I wonder if in North I can use words, created as if they were ‘found words’ (diaries, scraps of CCTV recordings), like the apparently ‘found objects’ in the Cardiff and Miller installations, to create a space where the audience can be either a character or author in their own time.

I am also continuing to looking at visual artists who make light installations such as Olafur Eliasson, Gunda Foerster, Jen Lewin and James Turrell.

Image

[1] Foster, Russell and Kreitzman, Leon, The Rhythms of Life: The biological Clocks That Control the Daily Lives of Every Living Thing, (Profile Books Ltd: London, 2005), p. 234

[2] I have an artist bursary now from Creative Scotland, which will enable me to do this both in Shetland and further north which I will do from 2014 – 2016.

[3] My thesis ‘Applying queer theory about time and place to playwriting’ can be found here http://theses.gla.ac.uk/3817/

[4] http://fruitmarket.co.uk/exhibitions/archive/cardiff-miller/

LIMF Clare

London International Mime Festival

Written on the way home from Stockton-Upon-Tees 7th February 2014

This time last week I was in London with Anu, Rupert, Xana, Sarah and Rain. We had seen two shows as part of the London International Mime Festival and spent time at The Roundhouse and in the morning I would explore the British Museum, have lunch with John Law (http://www.coindesk.com/author/john-law who was helping me out with my sketchy understanding of the fascinating possibilities of bitcoin). We flew back to Edinburgh on Saturday afternoon and I repacked my bags ready to leave for Stockton-Upon-Tees the next day, where I have been all this week working on Play Dough a show about money for 7-11 year olds.

It’s busy at the moment. Sometimes maybe it’s better to write blogs when you’re on a train that’s over crowded and smells suspiciously like someone is smoking weed in the toilets. Maybe blogging is supposed to be written in the cracks between the ‘real’ work? I don’t know.

I’ve been thinking recently about how much effort I put into tricking myself that I’m not really working, or that the work doesn’t matter, that it’s just a ‘warm up’. I find that if I’m really too aware of what I’m doing I can just get totally stuck. So here I am hopefully not too far away from Edinburgh, sitting on the most uncomfortable seats that Virgin could create, remembering what was really great about this time last week.

First of all the shows. They were both very beautiful both in look and sound. I haven’t been to LIMF before and I really wish I had. I wish I had a bit more context that I could understand the two shows with. I suppose I’m quite a word orientated person. I do like language but I don’t think words are more important than any other part of a performance. I think I’m interested more in experience and meaning in performance than anything else. This is what I mean when I say that I like and engage with story in performance. ‘Story’ is for me another way of talking about accessing to meaning and feeling.

But maybe I want this more from live performance than say music or visual art? Both these shows made me think again about how asking an audience to sit, facing in a specific direction, watching the same thing together, for a specific length of time, in itself constructs an expectation for story: even constructs the audience as story makers because I think we all start to tell ourselves stories as we interpret what we see happening in front of us. The LIMF is a festival of visual theatre. I wonder if this means that there is a specific challenge to this pre-disposition to construct meaning? Is it possible to have a ‘theatre’ that is purely visual? I suppose as ‘visual art’ is often very theatrical these points of genre connection is where the interesting new work is made.

I have been thinking a lot about how a piece of work asks for the attention and time of the audience, specifically when it is the traditional form of a ‘show’ where an audience enters an auditorium, sits down, the lights go down and the show begins. The site-specific piece I’m making for Summerhall in the Small Animal Hospital is called North. It is about extreme light conditions and I’m really excited to be working with lighting designer Katherine Williams in the development of creating it.

Going to LIMF was part of the process that I’ve come to deciding that North is going to 1) have a verbalised story and 2) that it is going to have an experiential ‘story’: A journey through light and 3) that both will be open to the audience all day…so maybe from 9am – 9pm. I’m still not sure if it will have live performers though. I might try a version with a live performer and one with out, to see which is best. Of course there are massive financial implications to these kinds of decisions. Especially as part of our trip to London reminded me that this residency is also about helping us as artists to step into international touring and making. A ‘show’ that is for generic kinds of sites rather than being strictly site-specific and one that has no live performers is going to be much cheaper to tour.

I’m really hoping to make this work to tour internationally. Part of this trip helped me re-evaluate that as a possibility. I’ve recently been awarded an artist bursary from Creative Scotland that will allow me to make some work collaboratively internationally. My show Money the game show is supposed to open in South Korea in the next month or so. Although, I don’t have any dates yet. So I’m keeping my fingers firmly crossed that that will happen. It’s so exciting to imagine a different culture on the other side of the world re-imagining your show. I also spent 6 years working with Stella Quines and Imago theatre on the bilingual Ana and Unlimited’s work has toured internationally quite a bit. So I’ve had some experience of international touring and making. But not as a writer and director, which is what this residency is particularly helping me find my feet with.

So, North at Summerhall will be a journey through light that can be experienced in as many different ways and times as the audience want to. I think the story part will be about an hour and will be on a loop and downloadable as a podcast so there is as much audience control of the experience as possible.

I’m interested in that text being too long to experience in one sitting, so that it encourages an audience to come back or engage with it somewhere else.

I’m also interested in this tension between visual art and the performing arts specifically in their different uses of time and demands from the audience.

So, thank you Anu, Rupert, Xana, Sarah and Rain for a great couple of days where the post-show discussions were a real privilege and it was fun drinking wine in the hotel bar too.

Second week of working in Shetland

The peninsular I'm writing about in Lerwick

The peninsular I’m writing about in Lerwick

I took the first picture here in June at the height of summer in Lerwick. The rest of the photos I took In mid December, when I spent 5 days in Shetland working on text for my residency and thinking more about extreme light conditions.

I’ve added here an interview I did with Jacqui Clarke an amazing writer and seriously interesting and funny woman, with plenty of insights into how extreme light conditions affect human beings.

I’ve turned it into a vimeo video because I couldn’t find a way of uploading the audio on it’s own. It’s 22 minutes long, which I know is a long time.

100_2796

But if you’ve got a quiet half hour put your feet up with a cup of tea and imagine you’re in Mareel in Lerwick http://www.mareel.org/visit/ the sun is setting, it’s about 2.30 in the afternoon. It’s felt like sunset since noon, when it briefly stopped feeling like dawn.

Interview is here http://vimeo.com/84461621

Also here https://vimeo.com/78357477  is a video scrapbook of some things that were floating around after that first week in June and before I went back.

100_2797 100_2795

My first week at Summerhall

I fell in love this week at Summerhall…with the building. I always thought it was a fine looking dame, classy, old fashioned, serious, but deeply-seriously beautiful, like a star of the silver screen. You appreciate beauty in photographs but you don’t ACTUALLY FALL IN LOVE. But this week, my first week, the image became real as I plugged in my computer, connected my SHINY new speakers by bluetooth and started to stick some ideas on the actual lovely walls.

I’ve collected some photographic evidence of my first week below.

I’ve been thinking about Extreme Light Conditions and how to make a performance that might make the audience-into-actors, I’ve been thinking about how to re-create light environments inside rooms and I’ve been thinking about who I might ask to collaborate with me.ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage

ImageImageImageImageImage